The ahi @ 25: Birth of an institution

As part of our 25th anniversary celebrations and staying focused on our purpose moving forward, we spoke to Andrew Cappie-Wood - former Director-General, NSW Department of Housing - about the circumstances behind establishing the Australasian Housing Institute (the ahi) and becoming our first member.

The early 1990s signalled the beginning of significant changes to Australia’s social/public housing sector. In many areas of Australian and New Zealand life, a host of services traditionally provided by governments were being offered to private interests. After the privatisation of utilities like energy and public transport, public housing was next in line. 


Governments of all political stripes began selling off their housing stock to private entities, with a view to making housing more efficient and improving outcomes for housing recipients. The era of state governments being the only large administrators of social housing was over with the rise of Community Housing Providers (CHPs). 


It was during this period, in 1994, that that Andrew Cappie-Wood was appointed Director-General of the NSW Department of Housing. Executive boss Gabrielle Kibble had instigated sweeping changes to the Department’s operations and culture; a move that would inadvertently lead to the establishment of the Australasian Housing Institute (the ahi). 


As Director-General, Andrew and his team saw a need to re-define what it meant to work in public housing. Like much of the public service in those days, many Department staff saw their role as little more than a secure job with a regular income. 

“We realised that we didn't have a profession. We had well-meaning people, but there was nothing supporting them, or us, in creating a housing profession.”

As Andrew explains it, the Department didn't really know what it was culturally, beyond being “the biggest player on the block". If tenants and people on waiting lists were to get better outcomes, he reasoned, then working in housing needed to become a bona-fide profession, with the same kind of support, recognition and professional development opportunities for employees that were par for the course in just about every other industry. 


“We realised that we didn't have a profession,” Andrew admits. “We had well-meaning people, but there was nothing supporting them, or us, in creating a housing profession. Out on the front line, there were people who just saw it as a job. It was a ‘thing’ rather than a passion for many people."


In parallel with considering how to better support staff in their roles, the Department wanted staff who believed in what social housing stood for, and who had the passion for helping people. To achieve this, redundancies were offered to those staff who would prefer to work somewhere else: “We wanted people who wanted to make a difference.” 


A trip to the UK to attend the Chartered Institute of Housing's (CIH) annual conference in Harrogate, was a seminal moment for Andrew, planting the seed for what would become the ahi. Being almost awestruck at seeing how the CIH supported people working across the sector and having established links with a similar professional body in Hong Kong, he came away from the conference determined to replicate something similar in Australia. 


“If you ask, ‘was there a single catalyst?’ that was, I suppose, the bringing back of the idea and having conversations with people about what could be possible.” 


Inspired as they were, Andrew and his fellow-travellers in the NSW Department of Housing knew (both literally and philosophically) the CIH-inspired organisation they wanted to establish needed to be a national—not a state-based entity— giving rise to a whole new basket of challenges. 

“Although the idea might have come from the Department, a professional body needed to represent all parts of the sector - be that social, affordable or Aboriginal housing workers.”

“We spoke about it as an executive, and it was seen as something which was absolutely a good idea, but no one had real experience in this. We knew if we just said 'make it thus' it would kind of stumble and fall. So, it needed a little bit of nurturing,” he says. “We also knew that, although the idea might have come from the Department, a professional body needed to represent all parts of the sector—be that social, affordable or Aboriginal housing workers. To be seen as professional body, it also needed to be independent of the Department as soon as possible.”


“When I mentioned it to Jennifer Westacott, she said, ‘yes! We've got to have this’. We mentioned it to Mike Allen. He thought it was a great idea from day one, and he's been an absolute champion for it ever since. And then some wise person, I don't remember who, said, ‘well, don't make it just Australia—it's got to include New Zealand and who knows who else wants to come along—let's make it Australasian. That was a very wise decision.” 


Underscoring the size of the challenge they faced, establishing the ahi as a formal 'branch' of CIH— an early strategy idea— needed to be shelved: “We looked at their charter and what they did, and of course they're starting at such a high level relative to ourselves. They had all sorts of grades of membership, which you actually had to qualify for. And so, they were so far advanced we realised it was going to be problematic to do that.”


“There was so much to understand and appreciate about how to make it work," Andrew continues. "This was going from a workforce that perhaps saw itself more as a cottage industry, although with a lot of well-meaning people—some absolutely brilliant people. We had to move away from that and move towards being a profession that supported a rapidly diversifying sector. We realised we were going to have to do it our way rather than necessarily piggyback on the UK Chartered Institute. 


“They gave us all the encouragement in the world and ended up being a very good support," he says of the CIH. "I went a couple of times in the nearly 10 years I was running housing in New South Wales to their annual conferences, and you just picked up so much. You’d say, 'right, that idea's coming home'. It was so good. We took the idea of having another go at community gardens, we gave the Foyer model a try and building professional support for those that worked in housing.”

“Having the Institute was a fundamental underwriting of the concept of having a housing profession.”

As Andrew moved on to work in a numbers of different departments, he kept up with the ahi's ongoing growth and development from a distance via the website. His passion for the Institute hasn’t diminished: “Having become absolutely professional, and to see the range of training and mentoring and other support supports available is really fantastic.” 


“Having the Institute was a fundamental underwriting of the concept of having a housing profession, because without that, there's no professional body—there's no collective wisdom— and that's what you're looking for: collective wisdom. 


"There's lots of people with fantastic ideas and a lot of experience. How do you share that? How do you actually bring that together in a way that is comprehensive and makes sense, is easy to access can be built upon and gives recognition? That's always one of the things which I thought the ahi should look to, is how do you get that professional recognition. How do you get the ahi after people's names, and people go, 'aha! The seal of approval’?”


Reflecting on 25 years of the ahi, Andrew paid tribute to the hard work and support of many stalwarts of the Institute, naming Mike Allen, Jennifer Westacott and Vivienne Milligan as seminal to the ahi's inception, as well as countless others. 


“It was easy to introduce the idea of starting a professional association in support of staff in a rapidly diversifying and maturing social and affordable housing sector," he concludes. "It was another thing entirely to have it brought into reality, and for this, Mike Allen should be given much of the credit. Without Mike, it wouldn't have been as successful as it has become. He was there from the very beginning, and he immediately said, 'yes, this is about being a profession—it's about supporting a profession'.” 


"I'm very proud to be able to call myself the ahi's Number One Ticket Holder!"


Read what Mike Allen and Unis Goh have to say about the  evolution of social housing in Australasia across the last 25 years

Share This Article

Other articles you may like

Harry Smith, new Australasian Housing Institute CEO
April 2, 2025
Harry Smith has recently commenced his role at the ahi as CEO after 26 years in the social services and government sectors across a range of diverse responsibilities. Harry brings a wealth of sector-specific knowledge and experience, supporting our members and our wider community.
February 14, 2025
It is with great pleasure that we announce nominations are now open for the ahi: 2025 Brighter Future Awards .
February 14, 2025
About the Australasian Housing Institute The Australasian Housing Institute (ahi) is a professional body for workers in the social and affordable housing and Specialist Homelessness Service (SHS) sectors across Australia and New Zealand. It has Branch Committees in each state and territory, as well as in New Zealand. The ahi is submitting a response to the Draft NSW Homelessness Strategy (the Strategy), representing the collective feedback of the NSW Branch Committee, with the support of the entire ahi organization. With over 2,000 members across NSW, ahi members work in both government and non-government housing organizations. The ahi has a long history of collaborating with SHS, Specialist Disability Services, and other mainstream services, including health, education, and local councils. For the past 25 years, ahi has been proudly delivering training for industry housing professionals across a wide range of areas, including tenancy management, asset management, and governance. The ahi also hosts masterclasses and networking events to support its members. The ahi provides professional development to the workforce through: Training and knowledge-building on a range of issues relevant to social housing professionals, from induction programs for new workers to advanced and specialized training in areas such as asset management, trauma-informed approaches with applicants and tenants, personal development, and community participation. A mentoring program that pairs experienced professionals with newer or younger members to help them achieve their career aspirations and goals. A certification program for social housing professionals to uphold professional standards and ensure success in their area of expertise. Leading the Annual Brighter Future Awards, which recognize excellence in the social housing industry. Promoting active, engaged, and connected membership through the delivery of topical events, seminars, webinars, masterclasses, and more. As a member-based professional body, the ahi is uniquely positioned to build trust, enhance skills, and foster relationships across both the government and non-government sectors, as well as between organizations. Summary The ahi congratulates the NSW Government on its significant investment of $6.6 billion in the 2024 budget, aimed at tackling the unprecedented housing stress and the rising numbers of individuals experiencing homelessness driven by the ongoing rental crisis in both the private rental and social housing sectors. The Strategy for 2025-2035 is highly commendable, with its three core goals—rare, brief, and non-repeated—standing out as ambitious and impactful objectives aimed at addressing homelessness. These goals are set to bring about significant changes in the social housing system and provide a clear policy framework to guide efforts toward achieving meaningful outcomes over the next decade. The ahi recognizes the importance of this Strategy and the critical role that the social and affordable rental housing system plays in meeting these goals, emphasizing the need for genuine, whole-of-government collaboration in delivering results. This approach involves collaboration across government, the not-for-profit community housing sector, and mainstream services, all supported by SHS’s within a Housing First framework and guided by a clear governance structure. It marks a shift from a deficit-driven perspective to a solution-focused, positive approach. The success of this transformation relies on collective efforts through co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery, ensuring the long-term effectiveness of the change. For this paradigm shift to succeed, it will require a skilled, committed, and dedicated workforce, as outlined in Principle 8 (The Workforce is Strong and Capable). Recognizing the need for a sustained, locally connected workforce is crucial to addressing the diverse needs of individuals experiencing homelessness across all three phases of their journey. In its feedback on the Strategy, the ahi emphasizes the importance of focused attention on homelessness and social housing workforce planning, professional development, industry support, and the need for culturally competent workers—both paid and voluntary—who bring diversity, inclusion skills, and lived experience. Finally, the ahi urges that Principle 8, which highlights the strength and capability of the workforce, be prioritized, particularly in supporting First Nations people experiencing housing stress and homelessness, with a long-term vision extending beyond the next 10 years. Detailed response The following is more a detailed response from the ahi to the questions outlined in the consultation paper for the Strategy. SECTION 1: The Guiding Principles of the Strategy 1. What do we need to consider as we implement services and system reform guided by these principles (total 9) over the next 10 years? As we implement services and system reform guided by these principles over the next 10 years, the ahi suggests the following approaches be prioritized: Workforce planning should be a key focus in the first rolling action plan (2025-2027), with an emphasis on forecasting the ongoing skills and competency needs throughout the life of The Strategy. This will ensure the workforce is equipped to meet evolving demands. Increasing the supply of dwellings to address crisis, transition, and permanent housing needs must be matched by a parallel increase in the workforce. This includes expanding both paid employees and volunteers within social housing, community housing organizations, and Specialist Homelessness Services (SHS). A well-supported workforce is essential to ensuring the successful and sustainable delivery of outcomes envisioned by the Strategy. Skilling workers who assist First Nations people experiencing homelessness should be prioritised. This requires a culturally competent workforce at all levels to provide high-quality services and ensure that First Nations people do not experience repeated homelessness. By focusing on cultural competence, we can foster better outcomes and long-term stability for these communities. 2. Which Principle should be prioritized and why? The ahi fully supports all nine Principles, with particular emphasis on Principle 8: Workforce is Strong and Capable, as being foundational. Addressing homelessness is a person-centered solution that requires culturally competent employees and volunteers who can establish strong, supportive networks with wraparound services at the local community level. This is essential to meeting the evolving needs and remains a high priority in the First Action Plan (2025-2027). Ongoing professional development for workers is crucial to ensuring long-term success in meeting the changing social, economic, and environmental needs of those living in quality housing. It is also vital for ensuring tenants not only live well but stay connected to their communities. Supporting the workforce’s safety and wellness is key to maintaining a capable, resilient workforce, which in turn ensures the best possible quality of housing, management, and support for tenants. SECTION 2: Strategy focus areas: 1. To make homelessness rare, what should NSW prioritise for action and why? The ahi believes that adequate funding for SHS’s is essential to ensure they are properly resourced to assist individuals at risk of or in a crisis state of homelessness at the point of need. The ability to identify risks and allocate resources effectively for intake assessments and service coordination is key to early intervention and prevention. A triage system is vital for facilitating positive outcomes, aiming to make homelessness a one-off experience. The ahi also supports dedicated funding for staff training and development in this field, recognizing its importance in preventing homelessness from becoming a long-term issue. Investing in training allows for timely and appropriate interventions, helping to break the cycle of homelessness early on. 2. What opportunities and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? Delaying action in assisting individuals experiencing homelessness can lead to a loss of faith and hope in the NSW housing system, pushing them toward the justice system or, in the case of older people or women escaping domestic violence, even premature death. Implementing this outcome presents an opportunity to build a culturally competent, and trauma-informed workforce, a key factor to transforming lives while simultaneously increasing the supply of housing. Supporting a resilient workforce, where high job satisfaction is fostered, creates committed and effective workers who can make a lasting difference. 3. What types (s) would be most useful to measure our impact and why? A key target in the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is to reduce the number of people on the social housing waitlist during the reporting period. This measure will serve as an indicator of success and validate the effectiveness of early intervention policies in preventing homelessness. Additionally, setting targets for the number of employees and volunteers in the social housing and SHS sectors, as well as tracking turnover rates, is essential to assessing the success of building a stronger, more capable workforce. 4. To make homelessness brief, what should NSW Priorities for action & why? Domestic violence, family abuse, and coercive control are major causes of homelessness among women, with the number of homeless women and children increasing according to the latest data. Adequate funding for this vulnerable group is a top priority. Supporting these women has a profound impact on their recovery, resilience, and ability to raise their children, leading to positive generational outcomes in the long term. The rising trend of older women experiencing homelessness for the first time also requires early intervention to prevent premature death. 5. What opportunity and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? The continued trend of women dying as a result of domestic violence and family abuse is deeply concerning. In 2024, 14 older women aged 55 and over were killed, a distressing statistic according to the Commissioner for Domestic and Family Violence, Michaela Cronin. These women are at a higher risk of vulnerability, often with no support systems to rely on. Implementing actions under this outcome presents a crucial opportunity to save lives, reduce the number of women experiencing both domestic violence and homelessness, and help them rebuild their lives. 6. What types of target(s) would be useful for measuring our impact and why? Reducing the number of women who die as a result of domestic violence and family abuse during the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is an important metric to track and report, demonstrating the efficacy of The Strategy. Individual success stories are powerful testimonies that show the goals of the Strategy are benefiting both individuals and the housing system. The skills required for employees and volunteers in this area demand dedicated funding and training resources. Implementing a measure to evaluate the outcomes of training courses would be valuable, helping to refine and improve the content and application of these programs. 7. To ensure homelessness is not repeated, what should NSW prioritize for action and why? First Nations people are overrepresented in experiencing homelessness and face significant challenges in breaking the cycle. Priority should be given to this group under the Housing First Principle, supported by skilled and capable staff and volunteers, to empower them and prevent repeat homelessness. Rental tenancy laws in NSW should be reviewed, particularly regarding the cessation of tenancy due to prolonged absences. Cultural customs related to death and bereavement (Sorry Business) should be recognised as acceptable reasons for absences and incorporated into tenancy policies. 8. What opportunities and risks are there in implementing actions under this outcome? The risk of not achieving the goals outlined in the National Agreement on Closing the Gap for the NSW Government is significant if priority is not given to properly housing and supporting First Nations people. There are valuable opportunities in collaborating with Aboriginal leaders through a co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery approach. Their collective commitment to improving the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people can lead to positive outcomes in housing, health, education, employment, justice, safety, and inclusion. 9. What types of target(s) would be most useful to measure the impact and why? Increase the number of Aboriginal workers with certified qualifications across various areas of the Aboriginal housing sector. Aboriginal tenants depend on highly qualified and culturally competent workers and volunteers to help build their resilience and prevent repeated homelessness. Regular customer satisfaction surveys should be conducted to measure tenants’ satisfaction levels and identify areas of strength and improvement. Conclusion The ahi supports an ambitious supply growth program throughout the life of the Strategy to address homelessness in NSW. With 63,260 households (based on 2023-2024 data) currently on the waiting list, it is crucial to reduce this number over the next 10 years through the rolling action plans. Successfully delivering the Strategy will require a skilled, trauma-informed, and competent workforce to implement an integrated housing system. While workforce planning is mentioned as one of the nine principles, its lack of detailed planning is concerning. The ahi strongly suggests that the principles of co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery be incorporated from the outset in developing the rolling action plans. The ahi thanks the NSW Government for the opportunity to submit feedback and for its ongoing consideration of building a strong and capable workforce that is recognised and supported by a broad range of industries. The value of including people with lived experience and their unique knowledge and skills cannot be overlooked as an essential voice in this transformative process. Contact NSW Branch Committee - Australasian Housing Institute admin@housinginstitute.org www.theahi.com.au (02) 6494 7566 Date submitted: 11/2/25 Submitted to: Homelessness.strategy@homes.nsw.gov.au
More Articles